CONTRACTS vs. Black Folk
by, 10-28-2010 at 01:16 PM (1858 Views)
what is a contract ??? there are numerous categories but only two distinct types- written and oral. examples of written contracts are the u.s. constitution and all of the state constitutions. contracts between nations are called treaties. most if not all corporations have their employees sign contracts of employment; even mac'donalds. oral contracts are agreements made between you and any other entity such as a man or woman or corporation. when you walk into mickey d's and order a big mac, you are contracting. when you agree to pay your landlord so many dollars per month for rent, you are contracting. when you put your car in the shop, you are contracting. when you walk up to the check out line in wal-mart with a carriage full of groceries, you are contracting.
you contract also with the light company, gas company, water company, telephone company, cell phone company, police department, courthouse, i.r.s., division of motor vehicles, hospitals etc... etc... in other words, everything we do, literally everything is, in this code of conduct called the u.s., contract.
your 'status' determines your obligation to those who own the contract. your name determines your status. the latin phrase 'capitus diminutio minima', 'capitus diminutio media', 'capitus diminutio maxima' are the three levels of status relative to your name. the first, minima, denotes a change in your status relative to your family and, as the word suggests, is minimal in its effect. the second, media, denotes a man or woman losing citizenship and family but not liberty (these are called diplomats). the third, maxima, denotes a man or woman whose status has been reduced to such an extent that no rights are afforded to such a 'person'; no liberty, no family and no citizenship. an example of these three levels of status are as follows:
minima= John Black Africa
media= John B. Africa
maxima= JOHN BLACK AFRICA
note that the term 'status' is a fiction and exists only in the mind of the 'person'. much the same as upper, lower and middle class. none such exists in reality but only in the abstract world of illusion. also note that all titles, labels, names etc., fall into one of the three categories mentioned relative to the spelling. i.e., minima, media, maxima...
so that, when we accept 'bills' that have the 'all caps' spelling, we are in fact contracting in the status of a 'person'. the same is true for all documents; court papers, i.r.s. notices etc...
i mentioned in a previous blog the significance (status) of the word 'person'. let me give you the legal definition:
person. in general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person), though by statute term may include labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives etc... scope and delineation of term is necessary for determining those to whom fourteenth amendment of constitution affords protection since this amendment expressly applies to "person".
there are a couple more words with very interesting definitions in the above... 'term' means, the meaning of the word referenced has been changed; e.g., the term 'person' now means corporations. 'include' means, to the exclusion of everything else. e.g., the term 'person' includes corporations. meaning, in this sentence, the term 'person' means corporations only. (these are the 'word games' that 'they' play- in order to figure these people out, we must have a thorough grasp of what these words mean and how they construct sentences (syntax)).
it is also interesting to note the author of the legal dictionary, BLACKS LAW 6th ed.,... took the time to tell us that the true meaning of the fourteenth amendment is the creation of 'persons' in the legal context. it goes on to create 'u.s. citizens' also. these 'terms' were applied to slaves who were transitioned from one plantation (corporation) to another; washington d.c. i don't want to get too far away from contracts but i want to speak to d.c. in respect to it being a plantation and how we now share the plantation with unwitting whites, who have also been reduced in status. you see fam, we live in slavery under the illusion of freedom and so do white folk... it is no longer about 'black and white'. it never really was. when slavery was abolished and the fourteenth amendment ratified, our status never changed. in reality, what has happened is whites now enjoy the same status that we do. how so ??? CONTRACTS!!! this does 'not' mean that unwitting whites are our allies in our struggle- the truth is that whites who oppose us do so out of the benefit they receive from the 'pecking order'. this pecking order was put in place back in the mid 1700's; when africans and europeans had enough in common to close ranks. in an effort to break the common bond that africans and european indentured servants formed to protest harsh treatment, a wedge of privilege granted to the poor, white, indentured servant was driven between them (note that in later years, after the adoption of the constitution, the common, everyday whites could not vote- this was reserved for landowning white men only). so, those of us who argue the validity of the constitution do so out of a misguided notion of equality, i think. in fact, the constitution was conceived of by slave driving white men for the benefit of slave driving white men, period.
has anyone ever read the application for a 'certificate of live birth' ??? or how about the application for 'motor vehicle registration' ??? there are three words that, in the legal context, messed my head up... they are: submit, apply and register. e.g., submit an application to register your automobile... in this one sentence, the 'applicant' is submitting, begging and giving away his 'automobile'. if you do not think that i am being honest about it, why do you think 'they' have the right to take your car or your child away from you ??? what gives 'them' that right ??? YOU DID !!! when you submitted an application and registered your property, you signed all of 'rights' over to whomever you submitted the application to. the following is a quote from colonel edward mandell house. speaking to president woodrow wilson back in the early 1900's, he said:
“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will effect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”
it is the 'contract' that affords 'them' the ability to rule over our lives. here are some of the contracts that we entered into not knowing what we may have been doing...
a 'person' who applies for a social security card is a TAXPAYER... a 'person' who applies for a drivers' license is a DRIVER... a 'person' who applies for a voter registration card is a VOTER... a 'person' who applies for a business license is an EMPLOYEE... a 'person' who applies for a bank account is a DEPOSITOR... and the list goes on. all of the aforementioned are called 'adhesions'; contracts which do not tell the whole story but contain the balance in a vault somewhere and you never get to see it. are they legal ??? yes and no- they are if you say you are a TAXPAYER or DRIVER or VOTER or EMPLOYEE or RESIDENT etc... they are not if you take the necessary steps to break away from all of the bullsh-t going on in this corrupt, bankrupt, horrid, filthy place. even the marriage license is a three party contract between the husband, the wife and the state. note husband/wife- not man/woman... granting property rights to the state if/when the 'marriage' is dissolved. why, because of the label 'husband or wife' and what these labels mean legally... anytime a label is used i am willing to bet that it is used to reduce the status of the man/woman to that of a 'person'.
all of the applications we submitted and all of the applications of registration we submitted were in fact, contracts of adhesion which we voluntarily entered into. all except the first one, the birth certificate. that is the one which was done for us by our parents or guardians. the details of which are found in the 'maternity act' of 1921. this is the contract that was signed into 'law' that colonel edward mandell house (a jew) spoke of to then president woodrow wilson. all contracts are assigned a monetary value and sold in the form of bonds on wall street. this is the economic engine of the united states corporation called america. to ignore this truth is to ignore the reality of life as we currently live it- unbeknownst to us.
in a previous blog, 'the law vs. black folk', i addressed traffic tickets. i neglected to include the reason why the judges so adamantly pursue your money. the reason why is because once the ticket is issued, someone has to pay it... in other words, the contract (ticket) is monetized and sold long before you ever get to court. so in many cases, the judge will not allow you to leave until they are satisfied that you 'understand' (stand under their words) that you are responsible for the face value of the ticket. when you defeat their misguided efforts, you force them to assume responsibility for their own bills that they attempt to force upon you. typically, the cop has to pay up. this is why it is important to grasp the reality of contracts and what we are doing when we enter into them.
note that we enter into contracts voluntarily... nobody forces them upon us. we 'think' we want the 'benefits' and 'privileges' offered to us in the contract. i can not speak to the 'adhesion', the part of the contract that is not in front of you when you 'sign'. i can only imagine what it says. it is bad enough that we do not read the part that do we sign. when we stop to think about things and study the 'behind the scenes' activities of what is really going on, we may come to realize that we do 'not' need to enter into the contract in the first place.
i recently discovered that a RESIDENT is actually a RESIDENT ALIEN ENEMY... interesting! a quick internet search doesn't turn up much- i can only imagine what is behind all of this... i do know that the above refers to the UNITED STATES. so it would appear that we are considered enemies of the UNITED STATES. this is not surprising, considering how we are treated.
Total Trackbacks 0