Are You Ready For War With Demonized Iran?

[XXPANTHAXX]

How much attention do elections in Japan, India, Argentina, or any other
country, get from the US media? How many Americans and American
journalists even know who is in political office in other countries
besides England, France, and Germany? Who can name the political leaders
of Switzerland, Holland, Brazil, Japan, or even China?

Yet, many know of Iran’s President Ahmadinejad. The reason is obvious.
He is daily demonized in the US media.

The US media’s demonization of Ahmadinejad itself demonstrates American
ignorance. The President of Iran is not the ruler. He is not the
commander-in-chief of the armed forces. He cannot set policies outside
the boundaries set by Iran’s rulers, the ayatollahs who are not willing
for the Iranian Revolution to be overturned by American money in some
color-coded “revolution.”

Iranians have a bitter experience with the United States government.
Their first democratic election, after emerging from occupied and
colonized status, in the 1950s was overturned by the US government. The
US government installed in place of the elected candidate a dictator who
tortured and murdered dissidents who thought Iran should be an
independent country and not ruled by an American puppet.

The US “superpower” has never forgiven the Iranian Islamic ayatollahs
for the Iranian Revolution in the late 1970s, which overthrew the US
puppet government and held hostage US embassy personnel, regarded as “a
den of spies,” while Iranian students pieced together shredded embassy
documents that proved America’s complicity in the destruction of Iranian
democracy.

The government-controlled US corporate media, a Ministry of Propaganda,
has responded to the re-election of Ahmadinejad with non-stop reports of
violent Iranians protests to a stolen election. A stolen election is
presented as a fact, even thought there is no evidence whatsoever. The
US media’s response to the documented stolen elections during the George
W. Bush/Karl Rove era was to ignore the massive documented evidence of
real stolen elections.

Leaders of the American puppet states of Great Britain and Germany have
fallen in line with the American psychological warfare operation. The
discredited British Foreign Secretary, David Miliband, expressed his
“serious doubt” about Ahmadinejad’s victory to a meeting of European
Union ministers in Luxembourg. Miliband, of course, has no source of
independent information. He is simply following Washington’s
instructions and relying on unsupported claims by the defeated candidate
preferred by the US Government.

Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, had her arm twisted, too. She
called in the Iranian ambassador to demand “more transparency” on the
elections.

Even the American left-wing has endorsed the US government’s propaganda.
Writing in The Nation, Robert Dreyfuss presents the hysterical views of
one Iranian dissident as if they are the definitive truth about “the
illegitimate election,” terming it “a coup d’etat.”

What is the source of the information for the US media and the American
puppet states?

Nothing but the assertions of the defeated candidate, the one America
prefers.

However, there is hard evidence to the contrary. An independent,
objective poll was conducted in Iran by American pollsters prior to the
election. The pollsters, Ken Ballen of the nonprofit Center for Public
Opinion and Patrick Doherty of the nonprofit New America Foundation,
describe their poll results in the June 15 Washington Post. The polling
was funded by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and was conducted in Farsi
“by a polling company whose work in the region for ABC News and the BBC
has received an Emmy award.” - You can find their report here

The poll results, the only real information we have at this time,
indicate that the election results reflect the will of the Iranian
voters. Among the extremely interesting information revealed by the poll
is the following:

“Many experts are claiming that the margin of victory of incumbent
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was the result of fraud or manipulation,
but our nationwide public opinion survey of Iranians three weeks before
the vote showed Ahmadinejad leading by a more than 2 to 1 margin --
greater than his actual apparent margin of victory in Friday's election.

“While Western news reports from Tehran in the days leading up to the
voting portrayed an Iranian public enthusiastic about Ahmadinejad's
principal opponent, Mir Hossein Mousavi, our scientific sampling from
across all 30 of Iran's provinces showed Ahmadinejad well ahead.

“The breadth of Ahmadinejad's support was apparent in our pre-election
survey. During the campaign, for instance, Mousavi emphasized his
identity as an Azeri, the second-largest ethnic group in Iran after
Persians, to woo Azeri voters. Our survey indicated, though, that Azeris
favored Ahmadinejad by 2 to 1 over Mousavi.

“Much commentary has portrayed Iranian youth and the Internet as
harbingers of change in this election. But our poll found that only a
third of Iranians even have access to the Internet, while
18-to-24-year-olds comprised the strongest voting bloc for Ahmadinejad
of all age groups.

“The only demographic groups in which our survey found Mousavi leading
or competitive with Ahmadinejad were university students and graduates,
and the highest-income Iranians. When our poll was taken, almost a third
of Iranians were also still undecided. Yet the baseline distributions we
found then mirror the results reported by the Iranian authorities,
indicating the possibility that the vote is not the product of
widespread fraud.”

There have been numerous news reports that the US government has
implemented a program to destabilize Iran. There have been reports that
the US government has financed bombings and assassinations within Iran.
The US media treats these reports in a braggadocio manner as
illustrations of the American Superpower’s ability to bring dissenting
countries to heel, while some foreign media see these reports as
evidence of the US government’s inherent immorality.

Pakistan’s former military chief, General Mirza Aslam Beig, said on
Pashto Radio on Monday, June 15, that undisputed intelligence proves the
US interfered in the Iranian election. “The documents prove that the CIA
spent 400 million dollars inside Iran to prop up a colorful but hollow
revolution following the election.”

The success of the US government in financing color revolutions in
former Soviet Georgia and Ukraine and in other parts of the former
Soviet empire have been widely reported and discussed, with the US media
treating it as an indication of US omnipotence and natural right and
some foreign media as a sign of US interference in the internal affairs
of other countries. It is certainly within the realm of possibility that
Mir Hossein Mousavi is a bought and paid for operative of the US
government.

We know for a fact that the US government has psychological warfare
operations that target both Americans and foreigners through the US and
foreign media. Many articles have been published on this subject.

Think about the Iranian election from a common sense standpoint. Neither
myself nor the vast majority of readers are Iranian experts. But from a
common sense standpoint, if your country was under constant threat of
attack, even nuclear attack, from two countries with much more powerful
military establishments, as is Iran from the US and Israel, would you
desert your country’s best defender and elect the preferred candidate of
the US and Israel?

Do you believe that the Iranian people would have voted to become an
American puppet state?

Iran is an ancient and sophisticated society. Much of the intellectual
class is secularized. A significant, but small, percentage of the youth
has fallen in thrall to Western sexual promiscuity, to personal
pleasure, and to self-absorption. These people are easily organized with
American money to give their government and Islamic constraints on
personal behavior the bird.

The US government is taking advantage of these westernized Iranians to
create a basis for discrediting the Iranian election and the Iranian
government.

On June 14, the McClatchy Washington Bureau, which sometimes attempts to
report the real news, acquiesced to Washington’s psychological warfare
and declared: “Iran election result makes Obama’s outreach efforts
harder.” What we see here is the raising of the ugly head of the excuse
for “diplomatic failure,” leaving only a military solution.

As a person who has seen it all from inside the US government, I believe
that the purpose of the US government’s manipulation of the American and
puppet government media is to discredit the Iranian government by
portraying the Iranian government as an oppressor of the Iranian people
and a frustrater of the Iranian people’s will. This is how the US
government is setting up Iran for military attack.

With the help of Mousavi, the US government is creating another
“oppressed people,” like Iraqis under Saddam Hussein, who require
American blood and treasure to liberate. Has Mousavi, the American
candidate in the Iranian election who was roundly trounced, been chosen
by Washington to become the American puppet ruler of Iran?

The great macho superpower is eager to restore its hegemony over the
Iranian people, thus settling the score with the ayatollahs who
overthrew American rule of Iran in 1978.

That is the script. You are watching it every minute on US television.

There is no end of “experts” to support the script. For one example
among hundreds, we have Gary Sick, appropriately named, who formerly
served on the National Security Council and currently teaches at
Columbia University:

"If they'd been a little more modest and said Ahmadinejad had won by 51
percent," Sick said, Iranians might have been dubious but more
accepting. But the government's assertion that Ahmadinejad won with 62.6
percent of the vote, "is not credible."

"I think,” continued Sick, “it does mark a real transition point in the
Iranian Revolution, from a position of claiming to have its legitimacy
based on the support of the population, to a position that has
increasingly relied on repression. The voice of the people is ignored."

The only hard information available is the poll referenced above. The
poll found that Ahmadinejad was the favored candidate by a margin of two
to one.

But as in everything else having to do with American hegemony over other
peoples, facts and truth play no part. Lies and propaganda rule.

Consumed by its passion for hegemony, America is driven to prevail over
others, morality and justice be damned. This world-threatening script
will play until America bankrupts itself and has so alienated the rest
of the world that it is isolated and universally despised.

[Pragmatic]

The group known as "Racists" are spinning there wheels on this one. Iran is in business with there Master, China, for the next 25 years. And as long as The Emperor is covering there financial bail out, they will spin for for there slaves, until they tidy up the "new monetary system", demanded by there "owners".

Peace be upon you