Your name or email adress:
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up


    Results 1 to 2 of 2
    1. #1
      Pragmatic's Avatar
      Pragmatic is offline Moderator

      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      San Diego
      Posts
      3,085
      Blog Entries
      15
      Thumbs Up/Down
      Received: 31/0
      Given: 12/0
      Rep Power
      325

      Blackicon Sleep KRS-One - Higher Level


      0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
      [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-vdKiGJM9M&feature=related"]YouTube - KRS-One - Higher Level[/ame]











      THE
      BIBLE


      CONTAINING THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS

      REVISED STANDARD VERSION

      TRANSLATED FROM THE ORIGINAL TONGUES, BEING THE VERSION SET FORTH A.D. 1611, REVISED A.D. 1881-1885 AND A.D. 1901, COMPARED WITH THE MOST ANCIENT AUTHORITIES AND REVISED A.D. 1952


      American Bible Society
      NEW YORK

      Preface

      The Revised Standard Version of the Bible is an authorized revision of the American Standard Version, published in 1901, which was a revision of the King James Version, published in 1611.

      The first English version of the Scriptures made by direct translation from the original Hebrew and Greek, and the first to be printed, was the work of William Tyndale . He met bitter opposition. He was accused of willfully perverting the meaning of the Scriptures,. . . . and his New Testaments were ordered to be burned as "untrue translations .". . . He was finally betrayed into the hands of his enemies, and in October 1536, was publicly executed and burned at the stake.

      Yet Tydale's work became the foundation of subsequent English versions, notably those of Coverdale, 1535;

      Thomas Matthew (probably a pseudonym for John Rogers), 1537;


      the Geneva Bible, 1560;

      and the Bishops' Bible, 1568.

      In 1582 a translation of the New Testament, made from the Latin Vulgate by Roman Catholic scholars, was published at Rheims.

      ?
      The translators who made the King James Version took into account all of these preceding versions; and comparison shows that is owes something to each of them.

      It kept felicitious phrases and apt expressions, from whatever source, which had stood the test of public usage. It owed most, especially in the New Testament, to Tyndale.

      ?
      The King James Version had to compete with the Geneva Bible in popular use;

      ^^^^bump^^^

      but in the end it prevailed, *( Roman Catholic scholars)
      and for more than two and a half centuries no other authorized translation of the Bible into English was made. The King James Version became the "Authorized Version" of the English - speaking peoples.

      note: It kept felicitious phrases and apt expressions, from whatever source, which had stood the test of public usage. It owed most, especially in the New Testament, to Tyndale.

      continued...

      The King James version has with good reason been termed "the noblest monument of English prose." Its revisers in 1881 expressed admiration for "its simplicity, its dignity, its power, it happy turns of expression . . . . the music of it's cadences, and the felicities of it's rhythm." It entered, as no other book has, into the making of the personal character and the public institutions of the English - speaking peoples. We owe to it an incalculable debt.

      Yet the King James Version has grave defects.

      By the middle of the nineteenth century, the development of Biblical studies and the discovery of many manuscripts more ancient than those upon which the King James Version was based, made it manifest that these defects are so many and so serious as to call for revision of the English Translation.

      The task was undertaken, by authority of the Church of England, in 1870.

      The English Revised Version of the Bible was published in 1881-1885; and the American Standard Version, its variant embodying the preferences of the American Scholars associated in the work, was published in 1901.




      Notes:



      • First of all The Kingdom of England/Great Britian holds the copywright to Christian belief and to the New King James Version.

      • England/Great Britain is the Angilcan Community.


      • The Act of Toleration was an act of the English Parliament (24 May1689, citation 1 Will. & Mar. c. 18), the long title of which is "An Act for Exempting their Majesties Protestant Subjects dissenting from the Church of England from the Penalties of certaine Lawes".



      • Dissenters were required to register their meeting locations and were forbidden from meeting in private homes. Any preachers who dissented had to be licensed.



      • The two countries had shared a monarch since the Union of the Crowns in 1603, when King James VI of Scotland inherited the English throne from his double first cousin twice removed, Queen Elizabeth I. Although described as a Union of Crowns, until 1707 there were in fact two separate Crowns resting on the same head.

      • note: Preseving the Union American Civil War (Preserving Slavery under The Amendment 13)

      • ..."In the annual presidential message to Congress of December 6, 1864, Lincoln called for the current House to pass the Thirteenth Amendment (rather than wait for the newly elected Congress, which was not scheduled to met until December 1865, a year away)". 13th Amendment Site
      • Isn't Lincoln known as The Great Emancipator?


      • First Act of Supremacy 1534

      • The Act of Supremacy November 1534 (26 Hen. 8, c. 1) was an Act of the Parliament of England under KingHenry VIII declaring that he was 'the only supreme head on earth of the Church in England' and that the English crown shall enjoy "all honours, dignities, preeminences, jurisdictions, privileges, authorities, immunities, profits, and commodities to the said dignity."

      • The consolidation of church and state under Royal Supremacy, as established by the Tudors, instigated political and religious strife in the succeeding centuries. This strife, along with similar struggles in Europe, is one reason there is a constitutional separation of church and state in many jurisdictions now.

      • In the United Kingdom, however, the Crown, through the government, still retains a significant involvement in the established Church of England. Through The Act of Supremacy.

      • By the middle of the nineteenth century, the development of Biblical studies and the discovery of many manuscripts more ancient than those upon which the King James Version was based, made it manifest that these defects are so many and so serious as to call for revision of the English Translation.

      • The task was undertaken, by authority of the Church of England, in 1870.

      • The English Revised Version of the Bible was published in 1881-1885;

      • and the American Standard Version, its variant embodying the preferences of the American Scholars


      • associated in the work, was published in 1901.

      • THE PRESENT REVISION MOVEMENT

        ORIGIN

        The present revision originated in the convocation, or general assembly of Episcopal clergymen, at Canterbury, England, on May 6th, 1870. Then and there a committee was appointed consisting of eminent Biblical scholars and certain high officials of the Church of England, "with power to revise, for public use, the authorized English versions of 1611, and to associate with them representative Biblical scholars of other Christian denominations using that version."


      • The "Convention" respecting fisheries, boundary, and the restoration of slaves between the United States and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, or the Treaty of 1818, was a party, hence, "convention", where "people dressed up as their favorite characters, and guest celebrities.

      • US Constitution Section 9 Clause 1. Importation of Slaves U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 9 - The U.S. Constitution Online - USConstitution.net

        Clause 1. The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

        In general

        The above clause, which sanctioned the importation of slaves by the States for twenty years after the adoption of the Constitution, when considered with the section requiring escaped slaves to be returned to their masters, Art. IV, § 1, cl. 3, was held by Chief Justice Taney in Scott v. Sandford,[1770] to show conclusively that such persons and their descendants were not embraced within the term “citizen” as used in the Constitution. Today this ruling is interesting only as an historical curiosity.


      • The founder's of the Constitution had no ethics. The Afripean *(next bullet) requested the return of there slaves in the Treaty of 1818, even though they had prohibited the importation and exportation of Prisoners of War (*slaves) after 1808.

      • In the Treaty of 1818, Article V agreed to refer differences over a U.S. claim arising from theTreaty of Ghent, which ended the War of 1812, to "some Friendly Sovereign or State to be named for that purpose". The U.S. claim was for return of, or compensation for, slaves that were in British territory or on British naval vessels when the treaty was signed. The Treaty of Ghent article in question was about handing over property, and the U.S. claimed that these slaves were the property of U.S. citizens.

      • So why are the Founding member's the U.S Constitution still dealing in the Migration and Importation? This is a question of morality and ethics?
      • Ethics is a branch of philosophy which seeks to address

      1.the state or quality of being good.

      2.moral excellence; virtue.

      3.kindly feeling; kindness; generosity.

      4.excellence of quality: goodness of workmanship.

      5.the best part of anything; essence; strength.

      6.a euphemism for God: Thank goodness


      Synonyms:
      2. integrity, honesty, uprightness, probity. Goodness, morality, virtue refer to qualities of character or conduct that entitle the possessor to approval and esteem. Goodness is the simple word for the general quality recognized in character or conduct: Many could tell of her goodness and kindness. Morality implies conformity to the recognized standards of right conduct: a citizen of the highest morality. Virtue is a rather formal word, and suggests usually goodness that is consciously or steadily maintained, often in spite of temptations or evil influences: of unassailable virtue; firm and of unwavering virtue. 3. benevolence, benignity, humanity. 4. worth, value.


      Antonyms:
      1. badness, evil.

      e⋅vil /ˈivəl/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [ee-vuhl] Show IPA –adjective
      1.morally wrong or bad; immoral; wicked: evil deeds; an evil life.
      2.harmful; injurious: evil laws.
      3.characterized or accompanied by misfortune or suffering; unfortunate; disastrous: to be fallen on evil days.
      4.due to actual or imputed bad conduct or character: an evil reputation.
      5.marked by anger, irritability, irascibility, etc.: He is known for his evil disposition.

      –noun
      6.that which is evil; evil quality, intention, or conduct: to choose the lesser of two evils.
      7.the force in nature that governs and gives rise to wickedness and sin.
      8.the wicked or immoral part of someone or something: The evil in his nature has destroyed the good.
      9.harm; mischief; misfortune: to wish one evil.
      10.anything causing injury or harm: Tobacco is considered by some to be an evil.
      11.a harmful aspect, effect, or consequence: the evils of alcohol.
      12.a disease, as king's evil.

      –adverb
      13.in an evil manner; badly; ill: It went evil with him.

      —Idiom
      14.the evil one, the devil; Satan.


      Synonyms:
      1. sinful, iniquitous, depraved, vicious, corrupt, base, vile, nefarious. See bad1. 2. pernicious, destructive. 6. wickedness, depravity, iniquity, unrighteousness, corruption, baseness. 9. disaster, calamity, woe, misery, suffering, sorrow.


      Antonyms:
      1. righteous.

      bad
      Origin:
      1250–1300; ME badde, perh. akin to OE bæddel hermaphrodite, bædling womanish man

      1.not good in any manner or degree.
      2.having a wicked or evil character; morally reprehensible: There is no such thing as a bad boy.
      3.of poor or inferior quality; defective; deficient: a bad diamond; a bad spark plug.
      4.inadequate or below standard; not satisfactory for use: bad heating; Living conditions in some areas are very bad.
      5.inaccurate, incorrect, or faulty: a bad guess.
      6.invalid, unsound, or false: a bad insurance claim; bad judgment.











      • Synonyms:
        2. depraved, corrupt, base, sinful, criminal, atrocious. Bad, evil, ill, wicked are closest in meaning in reference to that which is lacking in moral qualities or is actually vicious and reprehensible. Bad is the broadest and simplest term: a bad man; bad habits. Evil applies to that which violates or leads to the violation of moral law: evil practices. Ill now appears mainly in certain fixed expressions, with a milder implication than that in evil: ill will; ill-natured. Wicked implies willful and determined doing of what is very wrong: a wicked plan. 10. putrefied. 21. adverse, unlucky, unhappy

      • Bible Preface: Because of unhappy experience with unauthorized publications in the two decades between 1881 and 1901, which tampered with the text of the English Revised Version in the supposed interest of the American public, the American Standard Version was *copyrighted, to protect the text from UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES.


      • Crown copyright applies to all works produced by the British Government, subject to the condition that the qualification "Where a work is made by Her Majesty or by an officer or servant of the Crown in the course of his duties" is met. The Crown can also have copyrights assigned to it. There is also a small class of materials where the Crown claims the right to control reproduction outside normal copyright law due to Letters Patent issued under the royal prerogative. This material includes the King James Bible, and the Book of Common Prayer.


      • Is Tydale's work still being used? What really changed since 1611? Is the United States bible still under Crown Copyright? Who authorized the changes? If nothing has changed since the KJV of 1611 why are we reading willful monuments of the noblest perversion ever produced in history? Do you know your religion? Are you still reading The Great Bible, as a servant to The Crown?
      • The most available reprinting of the Great Bible's New Testament (minus its marginal notes) can be found in the second column of the New Testament Octapla edited by Luther Weigle, chairman of the translation committee that produced the Revised Standard Version.

      The RSV posed the first serious challenge to the popularity of the KJV, aiming to be a readable and literally accurate modern English translation of the Bible. The intention was not only to create a clearer version of the Bible for the English-speaking church, but also to "preserve all that is best in the English Bible as it has been known and used through the centuries" and "to put the message of the Bible in simple, enduring words that are worthy to stand in the great Tyndale-King James tradition."



      Bible notes: Philipians Chapter 2
      Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.

      Question: Why? It grieved the God that man was using the factualty's of thinking. The facualties they were already using before eating from the Tree of knowledge of good and evil. Eating is a behavior. Does God hold resentments? Is your God immoral, and irresponsible? The writers seem to think so. What do you think? Does only God possess the knowledge of principals, morallity, and a will to choose Good or evil? Why do they believe God created uncultured, and uncivilized savages who had no idea of principles, morals, or a will. . . . ?

      Cause the Catholic Church has got you to believe your a savage, who needs them to guide you. Better than any unpredicatable, irresponsible God who holds resentments and can't get over himself for creating humans who think. That he is so remorseful that in God time he resigns himself to a slow death on the cross for being so lame, in the image of the African, to atone for creating humans, more facilitated at living than He was. Cause nobody stepped up and murdered themselves for bible God, he did it all by himself. Poor God.


      Genesis 2
      15 And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. 16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: 17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

      Genesis 6
      5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. 6 And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. 7 And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.

      And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.


      repent: verb (used without object) 1.to feel sorry, self-reproachful, or contrite for past conduct; regret or be conscience-stricken about a past action, attitude, etc. (often fol. by of): He repented after his thoughtless act. 2.to feel such sorrow for sin or fault as to be disposed to change one's life for the better; be penitent

      Quran

      [3:181] GOD has heard the utterances of those who said, "GOD is poor, while we are rich." We will record everything they said, just as we recorded their killing of the prophets unjustly, and we will say, "Suffer the retribution of Hell.

      [3:182] "This is the consequence of your own works." GOD is never unjust towards the people





      Peace be upon you


      Treaty of 1818 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      Crown copyright - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      Crown copyright - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      Commonwealth realm - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      Book of Common Prayer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      English Reformation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      History of the English Revised Version (1881-85)
      Acts of Union 1707 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      Great Bible - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      Acts of Supremacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
      History of the Church of England - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    2. #2
      Pragmatic's Avatar
      Pragmatic is offline Moderator

      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      San Diego
      Posts
      3,085
      Blog Entries
      15
      Thumbs Up/Down
      Received: 31/0
      Given: 12/0
      Rep Power
      325

      Lightbulb Oath of Supremacy supercedes even God?


      0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
      Oath of Supremacy supercedes even God?

      The Oath of Supremacy, imposed by the Act of Supremacy 1559, provided for any person taking public or church office in England to swear allegiance to the monarch as Supreme Governor of the Church of England. Failure to so swear was a crime.

      Text of the Oath as published in 1559:
      I, A. B., do utterly testify and declare in my conscience that the Queen's Highness is the only supreme governor of this realm, and of all other her Highness's dominions and countries, as well in all spiritual or ecclesiastical things or causes, as temporal , and that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority ecclesiastical or spiritual within this realm; and therefore I do utterly renounce and forsake all foreign jurisdictions, powers, superiorities and authorities, and do promise that from henceforth I shall bear faith and true allegiance to the Queen's Highness, her heirs and lawful successors, and to my power shall assist and defend all jurisdictions, pre-eminences, privileges and authorities granted or belonging to the Queen's Highness, her heirs or successors, or united or annexed to the imperial crown of this realm. So help me God, and by the contents of this Book.



      This means God, and his creation, must submit to the to the Queen's Highness, her heirs and lawful successors.



      Question: If your only human and you make a mistake, you apologize, make an amend, and put it behind you. If you can repair the affliction, without allowing someone to hurt you, even better. This falls along the lines of forgiveness, and acceptance. The other party, or your self should be looking towards either, GOD willing. If your spiritually fit to do so. But we are talking about God holding a resentment so long, that he had Jesus sacrifice his life over to God. Not only did he empty himself over to God, but God came in and surrendered himself to "slavery, sin, obedience, and death, not any death, but murder in the image of a African Man."

      Phillipians 2:6 were you can read that exactly, "Have this mind among yourselves, which you have in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form he humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even death on a cross.)



      This is Afripeans interpretation of they God. They are ready to replace the "image" they created in Phillipians 2:6. They concocted an "image" using the African
      to maintain a everlasting resentment, towards people of color. Not only from God, but every one who "believes God can't handle conflict - resolution".

      Guess who's left holding the bag, if your the image God came back in and committed suicide in, cause he was so miserable, for creating "humans who could think". No wonder Africans folks walking around on eggshells...
      Even African folks is trying to prove God wrong. The mistake is proving the God of the Bible is African. This logically keeps you in a repetitive state of confusion. Looking for some validation of your humanity, all the while, Europeans have minupulated the scripture to make you worst than an animal. A human with no will to decide, and a God who's Judgment is flawed at the detriment of your "faith". This method of mind control establishes a Second class belief structure.

      What do you "feel" when you think "what would God do"?

      If you are internalizing what God would do, could you be internalizing the a low self image of yourself, unbeknowest, that God resented "making you" *(in the bible), and murdered himself to atone for his mistake; his poor lack of judgement *(Phillipians 2:6)?

      They created a person of color to be the fall guy. This African would come back and atone for his likeness of God, and murder himself, in front of the unbelievers????????

      In the image of a African.

      Not only is this God a sinner, as witnessed in the above verse, but hates his own "image" for even thinking.

      Pitiful, miserable, incomprehensible demoralization.

      Is this your "God"?

      Is your God pitiful, miserable, incomprehensibly demoralized?


      002:017 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thoushalt surely die.

      Even if you eat, which humans do. Can your God get over resentments? Can your God forgive you for creating hunger? Can you forgive your God for creating you human?

      They interpretation of a God does not want you to have a knowledge of yourself. They want you to believe man is not supposed to have any boudaries, principals, morals, or a will. A living organism has a will to live, with laws that govern it's existence. Who lied on your God?

      This type of thinking allows us to "believe" murdering innocent Africans, as witnessed below, is all in the name of God.

      Killing everything but the curse of being born into sin for wanting to seek knowledge.

      Now er'body scare us. They "feel" like God is a loser; and he came in ya'll image. So if fighting is prescribed, "Black nigga's with, who look like God does, feeled with depression, and ingratitude for living, is the ones we busting out on, first"? Because, they God is undependable, so they ready to finish him, and put to rest people of color, and start over fresh.





      What God do you worship?


      mor·al(môr'əl, mŏr'-)
      adj.














      1. Of or concerned with the judgment of the goodness or badness of human action and character: moral scrutiny; a moral quandary.
      .
      1. The lesson or principle contained in or taught by a fable, a story, or an event.
      prin⋅ci⋅ple

      a fundamental, primary, or general law or truth from which others are derived: the principles of modern physics

      law
      a principle based on the predictable consequences of an act, condition.

      a rule or manner of behavior that is instinctive or spontaneous

      behavior

      noun
      1.manner of behaving or acting.

      2.Psychology, Animal Behavior.
      a.observable activity in a human or animal.
      b.the aggregate of responses to internal and external stimuli.
      c.a stereotyped, species-specific activity, as a courtship dance or startle reflex.

      3.Often, behaviors. a behavior pattern.

      the action or reaction of any material under given circumstances:

      like thinking...Is your God an Idol worshipper, who allows it's creation to run all over him?

      Parents run they house with rules, principles, and guidelines or there children would do anything they wanted. What are we to believe about our interpretation of a God who can't, and won't "keep a' hold of his creation". Come on now.
















      The Quran

      [38:27] We did not create the heaven and the earth, and everything between them, in vain. Such is the thinking of those who disbelieve. Therefore, woe to those who disbelieve; they will suffer in Hell.

      The Bible
      22 Then the LORD God said, "Behold, the man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil; and now, lest he put forth his hand and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever" -- 23 therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from which he was taken. 24 He drove out the man; and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to guard the way to the tree of life.


      Born in Sin, shaped in Inequity: The "Original" Sin Are you being hunted




      The ultimate removal of sin from the souls of the believing and pardoned is left by Scripture in no uncertainty. It was foretold in the name given to the Saviour at His birth: "Thou shalt call His name Jesus, because He shall save His people from ["out of," not "in"] their sins." It was implied in the object contemplated by His incarnation: "He was manifested to take awayour sins."


      It is declared to have been the purpose of His death upon the cross: "He gave Himself for us, that He might redeem us from all iniquityand purify unto Himself a peculiar people zealous of good works."
















      • Can you be a second class believer, if you atone for being born with color?

      • Do you have to walk around stupid and unaware to be good?
      "The Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat, but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil thou shalt not eat of it, for in the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die" (Genesis 2:16);


















      • If God was manifest in the flesh isn't god a sinner?

      • Because God was black, and had to die for the sins of other people of color, wouldn't that make Black people lame, and undependable?

      • Should you validate other peoples emotions (*feelings, thoughts, and behaviours) against your only feeling of worthyness?

      • Are people generally afraid of the "image of Brown people" because of the the suicide of God in flesh of a African?

      • If God committed suicide in the image of the African, could this be one of many reason's people have such a low self image of themselves?

      • Could believing in this image of yourself, in the likeness of God, lead to other destructive feelings, thoughts, and behaviours, brought on by discrimination, thus making you a racist?

      • Have African people been duped into believing God hates black people and regrets creating them so bad, they he would kill himself to atone for his horrible mistake, and atone to the rest of mankind cause we were a waste of an idea?

      • What God are you "worshipping"?
      King James Bible 6:6



      And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.


      repent: verb (used without object) 1.to feel sorry, self-reproachful, or contrite for past conduct; regret or be conscience-stricken about a past action, attitude, etc. (often fol. by of): He repented after his thoughtless act. 2.to feel such sorrow for sin or fault as to be disposed to change one's life for the better; be penitent

      Quran

      [3:181] GOD has heard the utterances of those who said, "GOD is poor, while we are rich." We will record everything they said, just as we recorded their killing of the prophets unjustly, and we will say, "Suffer the retribution of Hell.

      [3:182] "This is the consequence of your own works." GOD is never unjust towards the people.




      There was a system of illusion so powerful, that it had me validating other peoples thoughts, as reality. It had me existing as a racist; dominated by stereotypes, that dictated my feelings, thoughts, and behavious, all because God, made me in his image, and that was a mistake Gen 6:6, you see, God wanted man and women to be stupid, so he could serve them,. . . . validate there existence.

      It was a sin to believe, and (so I thought), God could not be more relevant than me.

      So I did what I wanted to do. I even believed God was so merciful, he killed himself, in the "image" of a "Black man" to give hope to the rest of the world, for creating such a lame race of people.


      Gen Chp.3

      "...And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, "You may freely eat of every tree of the garden; 17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall die."
















      • In the beggining, these people didn't need to experience reality??

      • Were more relevant than the entire creation?

      • They wouldn't have to be grateful, or practice spirtual principals?

      • They would let God do all the thinking, while they just sat around, ate and kicked it?

      • Why?

      • Because God has all the time in the world to create humans, with brains, and intellegence, and is so narcisstic, he would have them live forever watching him do "HIS THANG". Cause God can do that?

      That is not the God i worship today, GOD willing.


      The Quran

      [2:255] GOD: there is no other god besides Him, the Living, the Eternal. Never a moment of unawareness or slumber overtakes Him. To Him belongs everything in the heavens and everything on earth. Who could intercede with Him, except in accordance with His will? He knows their past, and their future. No one attains any knowledge, except as He wills. His dominion encompasses the heavens and the earth, and ruling them never burdens Him. He is the Most High, the Great.



      [15:85] We did not create the heavens and the earth, and everything between them, except for a specific purpose. The end of the world will come, so treat them with benign neglect.
      [15:86] Your Lord is the Creator, the Omniscient.

      all flesh had corrupted its way upon the earth" (Genesis 6:12);

      all mankind had "gone aside and become filthy,"

      "there was none that did good, no, not one" (Psalm 14:3);

      "There is no man that sinneth not" (1 Kings 8:46), ), not even the best of men who have been born again by the Spirit and the incorruptible seed of the Word of God, renewed in their minds and created anew in Christ Jesus
      "all had sinned and come short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23);



      Ephesians 6:5 Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ; 6 Not with eyeservice, as menpleasers; but as the servants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart ; 7 With good will doing service, as to the Lord, and not to men: 8 Knowing that whatsoever good thing any man doeth, the same shall he receive of the Lord, whether he be bond or free.

      9 And, ye masters, do the same things unto them , forbearing threatening : knowing that your Master also is in heaven; neither is there respect of persons with him.



      Ancient History Sourcebook: Genesis [RSV]

      The Law of Affirmation that illegally convicted our ancestors








      [2:117] The Initiator of the heavens and the earth: to have anything done,
      He simply says to it,
      "Be," and it is.



      Peace be upon you


      http://www.assatashakur.org/forum/me...ack-green.html
      http://www.assatashakur.org/forum/me...now-page2.html
      http://www.assatashakur.org/forum/me...now-page3.html
      Last edited by Pragmatic; 10-25-2009 at 04:43 AM.

    Thread Information

    Users Browsing this Thread

    There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Similar Threads

    1. Higher Placed Traitors
      By TTDC Bot in forum Revolutionary Daily Thoughts
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 04-07-2011, 02:00 AM
    2. Higher Forms of Killing
      By TTDC Bot in forum Revolutionary Daily Thoughts
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: 05-13-2009, 01:53 PM
    3. HIGHER Education
      By rebelAfrika in forum Young Afrikan Pioneers
      Replies: 6
      Last Post: 01-16-2008, 03:33 PM
    4. higher intelligence
      By Kweku_Omowale in forum Poetic Resistance - Spoken Word - Poetry
      Replies: 1
      Last Post: 06-21-2006, 06:49 PM
    5. What Is Higher Knowledge
      By GoodRain in forum Open Forum
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 02-25-2006, 12:40 PM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  


    About

      Assata Shakur Speaks is an Forum Devoted To Assata Shakur And All Political Prisoners Around The World.
      Assata Shakur Speaks Is An Oasis Of Pan African Information Geared Towards The Liberation Of Afrikan People.

    Follow Us On

    Twitter Facebook youtube Flickr DavianArt Dribbble RSS Feed



    BACK TO TOP