EXCUSES,INTERRACIAL:Worms Hooks Sinkers

[Baba Ahmed]

"Afrikan parents know who they are dealing with. That's why we lie to our children in the name of protecting them. Such excuses are shameless. We are not protecting them. We are trying to protect ourselves from the pain we know will come to them and us if they stand up.

No matter how we try to play it off, we understand that Europeans will kill them in a second, for nothing. We understand that our sons are looked upon as the greatest threat to European hegemony for good reason. And yes, as men, they are our last line of defense. There is nothing unrealistic about these fears. They are reasonable for a people who subconsciously understand the nature of their oppressor, as evidenced in historical fact, yet feel powerless to confront it.

However, these reasonable fears lead to insanity when they cause us to believe that no matter what we do the European will rule forever. 'Oppression does not destroy a people. It is the acceptance of oppression that destroys.'6 Our actions become divorced from our words. We consistently compromise our stated power and morality. By example, we subconsciously establish limits for our children at the same time that we tell them they are limitless. By following the example set by their parents, emasculated Afrikan males become living expressions of confused, powerless mentacidal negroes.

To ensure the safety of their children Afrikan parents know they must make integration and absorption, a foremost priority. It becomes more and more urgent that they be spread out among our enemy. And in doing so we must make them believe that it is their responsibility to make a color-laden world colorless.

Palestinians once hid their European-Israeli hostages throughout their cities in the hope that the knowledge that they would kill one or two of their own would deter Western missiles. Like Afrikan parents, they misunderstood European's sense of martydom. Racial nationalism has always overridden any appreciation of life in European culture. Any notion of sparing an innocent's life has never stopped them from sacrificing their own.7

Yet this mentality is not incompatible with encouraging interracial dating and marriage. Nonwhite people don't understand the necessity for white supremacy domination, but white people understand thaty they have to dominate. So when a white person is in bed with a nonwhite person, because of the long history of conditioning that tells them nonwhites are inferios, the nonwhite person will programmed to love white people... The highest desire, under white supremacy programming, is to be loved by a white and validated by a white person. So the white person who is acting counter to white genetic survival by engaging in sexual activity with the nonwhite person is actually achieving a greater goal: the goal of domination. The nonwhite person's mind has been turned against their own interest...the nonwhite person has to turn against the interests of other nonwhite persons to protect the interests of the white person they're in bed with. That means the white person is the dominant person, no matter who's on top or bottom in the act of sexual intersourse.8

She is far from alone in her deduction. In his discussion of The Insane Nigger Mack B. Morant concurs with this when stating that

...any black person who buys into an inter-racial marriage can in no way stand up and support the black race completely. He or she will compensate psychological or physical defense mechanisms to protect his or her white wife or husband and in many ways shield their own conscience.9 Plus, it emasculates potential Afrikan warriors. Interracial marriage and statements of colorlessness are based on the desire to become indistinguishable from the master and get as far away from the Afrikawe still hate and are embarrassed by as we possibly can, except in misguided efforts to go back and economically and religiously exploit it as new world colored carpetbaggers. Afrikan males exhibiting the least aggression against European cultural imperialism are increasingly rewarded with superficial tidbits of success. The marriage and care of a European girl shows her father that her negro is safe and worthy of larger crumbs. Negroes must successfully pass every proctoloby exam in order to move to the head of the class

A concern for his children's future also leads Afrikan males to seek out European spouses. Mulatto, or biracial, children remain the recipients of greater privilege for obvious historical reasons. It has been successfully argued that they are aesthetically more pleasing to the eyes and sensibilities of Europeans. Western society's distaste yet fondness for the products of Afrikan-European unions has never changed. Look at the history.22 Or, jsut turn on the TV. Who disproportionately stars in 'Black' female leads? Are such truths painful? Yes, but we have no more time to murn the tragic mulatto than the poor little rich white girl.

In whatever country on whatever continent you look, after the people from the Caucasus Mountains ravage and appropriate their civilization, you see the proliferation of children produced by Caucasians raping conquered women and girls. The majority of these offspring, siding with their most powerful parent, come to form a buffer class between paranoid European elites andterrorized dark hordes. Because of their dual racial citizenship, mulattoes ahve historically been favored as agents of 'crowd control' over the darker masses. Many scholars make note of this phenomenon in the history of European global imperialism.

[indent]If history is a tool for learning so that mistakes are not repeated, and if we are wise enough to discern events repeating themselves over and over again forming patterns to our disadvantage, then we must understand the connection between a developing privileged mulatto class to the maintenance and strengthening of white supremacy. Chancellor Williams detailed this pattern in his The Destruction of Black Civilization. But, regardless of the qualifying recognition that should be given to those mulattoes who understood and understand who their people are, his point taken out of early Egyptian history has remained a constant that deserves our undivided attention here and now.

The end result was always the same: The Blacks were pushed to the bottom of the social, economic and political ladder whenever and wherever the Asians and their mulatto offsprings gained control. This scheme of weakening the Blacks by turning their half-white brothers against them cannot be overemphasized because it began in the early times and it became the universal practice of whites, and is still one of the cornerstones in the edifice of white power.11

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baba note: see next post below for footnotes. from:

EXCUSES, EXCUSES: The Politics of Interracial Coupling in European Culture by Larry Crawford (Mwalimu A. Bomani Baruti)

[Baba Ahmed]

6. Albert B. Cleage, Jr. Black Christian Nationalism, Detroit: Luxor Publishers of the Pan-African Orthodox Christian Church, 1987 (first published 1972).
7. An example worth of considersation is the sacrificing of their own in order to get at four brothers trying to beark out of a court house at the height of the country's assault on the Black Panther Party. George Jackson's brother Jonathan...

(h)ad passed out automatic pistols to the inmates at the hearing who joined him: Arthur Christmas, Ruchell Magee and James McClain. A shotgun had been tied to the neck of the judge. The prosecutor, selected members of the jury and the judge had been marched outside at gunpoint....They had marched outside to a van, all hostages, and entered the van. Then the bullets had rained down. Hundreds and hundreds of rounds from the weapons of San Quentin guards and sharpshooters had been rapidly sprayed into and around the van. The judges's head had been blown off. The prosecutor had been critically wounded by San Quentin guard bullets.(Elaine Brown, A Taste of Power, NY: Anchor Books, 1992, p.230)

8. Francis Cress Welsing interview in Kwaku Person-Lynn (ed.), First Word, NY: Harlem River Press, 1996, pp.74-75
9. Holly Hill, SC: R & M Publishing Co., Inc, 1982 (2e),p.49.
22. NY: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1992, pp.53-54.
11. Chicago: Third World Press, 1987, pp.59 and 61. Especially look at pages 178-179 and 185-186 for a discussion of that historical collection of mulattoes who chose to side whit their Afrikan mothers against the enemy of their people. This is but a very small sample of the documented evidence of a divisive cospiracy that finds itself wherever we find European invaders.
__________________________________________________ _______________

All cited in Baruti's EXCUSES, EXCUSES: The Politics of Interracial Coupling in European Culture.

Contact me at: the.swampseedslamb@gmail.com or 404.755.2963 if u want this and any other book written by Mwalimu Baruti (aka Larry Crawford)

Medaase for your time and attention.
Kwame Baba Ahmed


ALUTA CONTINUA!!!

[Baba Ahmed]

Greetings & salutations! My heart will not let me go to sleep, leaving this thread hanging in suspense and a sense of condemnation. Once I've done best I can to present clear and useful info, then so be it. Also those who are familiar with my writing, know that I never make any claim to be fair, objective or balanced, except to my Afrikan people and those not of Euorpean race or who do not empathize with them. Shall we proceed?
__________________________________________________ _____________

pg 110

The bastardization of a people is a basic European divide and conquer strategy. It enables the absentee ownership of people through the biological creation of a home grown marginal elite intensely loyal to their fathers. We find this as a pattern throughout the world Europeans have violated and laid claim to. Scholarly examinations of some better known examples of the mullatto nationalism handcrafted by the intentional cultural politics of European imperialism can be found in the interactions of the Blacks, Coloreds, Indians and whites of Azania.(12) and the international descriptions given by John Henrik Clarke,(13) Chancellor Williams,(14) Randall Robinson(15) and Jacob Carruthers.(16)

This evidence in no way condemns all or even most of those who had no choice in being born of two races. House slaves caught hell, too. Nor, for that matter, is it an attempt to confer on all relatively 'pure' Afrikans an Afrikan nationalistic loyalty. There is no doubt that negroes contaminate the range of our complexion. However, Williams' suggestion that those mulattoes who remained loyal to their Afrikan heritage should be praised, singling them out for 'special honor,'(17) as compared to Afrikans born without the privilege of choice, is a questionable recommmendation.

Skin tone is one of the least important indicators of who is or is not Afrikan.(18) Clarence Thomas, Vernon Jordan and Armstrong Williams are perfect examples of this misconception. Afrikanity is a mentality. It is an identification with a revolutionary Afrikan history, present and future. It is mental.

'Those who will to work for justice and who understand that work as their conscious responsibility will be found in all places and in all walks of life, at all levels of formal education and at all income levels. There are no class divisions nor language barriers for those who do this cosmic work.(19)

Afrikan consciousness covers the range of complexion in our community. It does not discriminate based on pigment. 'We are Africans not because we are born in Africa, but because Africa is born in us.'(20)[indent]From this brief look at a historical pattern it would not take a leap in thinking to conclude that Europeans today, well aware that their time is up, are doing everything in their power to enlarge and further strengthen the buffer class they hope will serve to protect them from a forgiving but unforgetting and furious dispossessed people.(21) A racially indistinct buffer class serves to confuse, misdirect and dissipate this justifiable rage. When operating as a political unit in the service of European culture, such a buffer class escalates racial confusion among Afrikans. The mulattoization of a significant segment of the world's Afrikan population through the biological and surgical infusion of Europeanized features will seriously confuse and compromise racial origins, responsibilities and global politics.[/b][/u]

As already stated, this fact is not new in the minds of Europeans sitting precariously on their throne of enforced racial privilege. Their media, and the individuals selected as spokespersons in that fantasy, relect this awareness. Because of their high visibility, statements about their race by popularized individuals such as Tiger Woods and Mariah Carey, who in their confused yearning to identify themselves as 'American' attempt to claim every possible European strain as part of their racial makeup, and consistently identifying these minority genes first, promote the spread of the racial confusion which sustains the internal chaos necessary for the voluntary maintenance of white supremacy among the darkest populations.

A contemporary movement illustrating that this treachery has not ceased is rising among those wanting to be categorized outside of Black or white census categories. Multiple/biracial census categories serve the interests of those who wish to have the socially accepted right to claim nonloyalty to Afrikans, those who may appear but don't want to be Afrikan, and those who seek to separate and elevate themselves in the tradition of their historical mentors who selfishly lapped up their share of the material and social spoilage as privileged members of a buffer class. No matter the publicity stting that this move is to establish themselves apart from Afrikan and European as the 'New Americans,' the new colorless human race, these group politics serve a purpose. Their mission is informed by both history and the rapidly unfolding social devastation. Be not deceived, the purpose is not to get closer to the powerless. It is to move deeper into the house of the European who remains entrenched at the top of the human food chain.

But is our thinking too small, not grand enough for the challenge? Can we see through the European vision of unlimited power and control into the future? Have they now moved beyond manipulation nations to a final, total, conquest and domination of a so-called global culture? The new world order is original European imperialistic thinking. It is not new. So, since nothing has changed there, and the world has grown significantly smaller, are they now trying to create and consolidate a buffer race to control the world's people of color? Have individual nations been no more than haphazard experiments leading up to this final test?

It's amazing, but not surprising, that people pointed out and publicly discussed every major point Andrew Hacker made in Two Nations except one. Somehow they forgot a major detail guiding his thesis. He had no question that many Europeans already recognize that their time is up.

Liberals also hold a theory about the sweep and tenor of human history. While seldeom stated as a coherent philosophy, its premises occasionally become explicit. One such tenet is that the era of white dominance is coming to an end. If nothing else, birthrates dictate that the approaching century will belong to people of color, just as immigration is changing the texture of the United States. True, the Western world still has military might; but it lacks social goals and moral purpose. Hence the desire of liberals to find a place for themselves in the new era: so the future will note that they were among the few white persons who foresaw what was coming and were prepared to accept their diminished status.

This is the basis of European politics, of white supremacy - the drive to racially survive.
__________________________________________________ _______________

12. Nelson Mandalela,Long Walk to Freedom,NY: Little, Brown and Company, 1994; Chancellor Williams, The Destruction of Black Civilization: Great Issues of a Race From 4500 B.C. to 2000 A.D., Chicago: Third World Press, 1987, p.76. Also see Kathy Russell, Midge Wilson and Ronald Hall, The Color Complex, NY:Anchor Books, 1992, pp.60-61 for a short summary of the institutionalized racial classification system.
13. He wrote,

I have always threatened to write a massive book about...The Role of the Bastard as a Facrot in History. How people have bastardized other people through their women and used the bastard to control them. Then having used the bastard, refuse to accept him and send him back to his mother's people to start confusion. (Notes for An African World Revolution, Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 1991, pp.252-253)

He also points to the direction he feels the analysis should go on pages 25, 46-47 and 100 in a collection of essays by Yosef ben-Jochannan and himself he edited entitled New Dimensions in African History (Trenton,NJ: Africa World Press, 1991).

14. The Destruction of Black Civilization, pp.50, 51, 71, 73-79, 154-155, 208, 218, 298 and 304.
15. Defending the Spirit, NY: Dutton, 1998, pp.75-77.
16. Although his discussion begins on page 33, he makes the same point about mulatto nationalism during the Haitian revolution.

They...did abolish slavery but forced the Blacks to remain on the plantations and work as before, but this time with wages. They also recruited many Blacks into their army but never let any rise above the rank of Captain and none were civilian offices holders. The Mulattoes, however, were even more harsh on the Europeans, exterminating many and allowing them no positions of authority. (The Irritated Genie, Chicago: The Kemetic Institute, 1985, p.36.)

17. While his statement must be assessed in the context of his Destruction of Black Civilization it has face value.

We should begin by drawing a vast African Circle of Honor around all those millions of Africans of mixed blood often referred to as Mullatoes, who from the earliest times to the present have stood steadfast and loyally identified with the race of their originally black mothers. They deserve special honor exactly because they did not have to do so when amalgamation of the races spread over Egypt and the Arabic world, and they had compelling reasons for not being identified with black-skinned Africans. For they were classified as 'white' and, therefore, not subject to enslavement. p.334.

18. Crawford, "Racism, Colorism and Power," "Frontline, Vol.3, No. 7, October 1999.

19. Francis Cress Welsing, The Isis Papers, Chicago: third World Press, 1991, p.xvii.

20. Chester HIggins, Jr., Feeling the Spirit, NY: Bantam Books, 1994, p.233.

21. Except for the truly insane, we must understand the politics of our oppressors for what it is.

......

Forgiveness is supposed to be a recognition or belief by the forgiver that the perpetrator's action will not occur again, that there will be a conscious attempt to never do whatever was done again. They have not stopped. Nor do they intend to. Second, forgetfulness downplays, to the oppressor's advantage, the roots of all revolutionary change--someone was wronged, with malice, forethought and beyond reason, and continues to be wronged in the same intolerable way....And, third, remembrance is a necessary and natural cleansing/healing ritual where the Maafa (the destruction of Afrikan civilization and culture and the enslavement, colonization and dehumanization of its people) is transformed into a wisdom that brings us as an Afrikan people back toward our rightful cultural Way. Our self-determined historical memory serves as a constant reminder to never let what happened to us happen again. (Larry D. Crawford, "The New Humanity," The Faith Tribune, March 12, 1999, p.5)