Beau Sia - Back To The Now

[Pragmatic]

YouTube - Beau Sia - Back To The Now

YouTube - Beau Sia - Back To The Now

GPS Dog Collars, What Happend to Good Old Fashioned Training?

Posted by admin on Nov 12, 2008 in Products
I find many things ridiculous and I am always amazed by what people will spend money on. For example I was browsing through one of those mall magazines you get free while on the airplane and came across a gadget that I could believe people would pay hundreds of dollars for. The item in question is a dog gps collar which keeps tabs on your dog at all times.
This is just seems ubsord to me. Why on earth would you constantly need to track your dog and why would you want to spend $500 dollars on such an item. Is it so hard to train your dog to behave and not run away? I guess that means I’m old fashioned but I just could not believe we have come to this.
http://whatisjoppa.com/

Identity cards

Identity cards will provide an easy and secure way for legal UK residents to prove who they are.

Identity cards | Home Office
US National ID Cards by May 2008

YouTube - Sing-A-Long National ID Card - Ghana Style!

YouTube - Sing-A-Long National ID Card - Ghana Style!

Real ID in NY

YouTube - Mass chipping of Americans has begun

YouTube - Mass chipping of Americans has begun

National ID Cards
We are presently producing identification cards for one nation from our US based offices. Additionally, we are developing on site solutions for citizens to arrive at offices (and mobile offices) with the appropriate paper work and walk away with a national photo identification card moments later. This is a critical factor when it comes to producing national ID cards for nations that don’t have a proven postal delivery system.

Since many companies have been developing solutions on the higher end, we have been developing solutions that are more affordable. The present solution being developed provides the government with an online secure database providing citizen profiles for criminal records, border crossing and proof of citizenship. Live scan fingerprinting is also incorporated into the processes to incorporate a bimetric recognition solution. While we have incorporated RFID and smart card technologies into many solutions, we have steered away from these technologies because of the current controversies and their expense.

By using proven secure techologies we have been able to produce solutions that cost as little as $10 per individual in a turn key solution.


This sample pricing includes:

• Capturing Personal Information
• Secure National Database
• Digital Photographs
• Digital Fingerprints
• Secure Photo Identification Cards

• Holograms
• Nano Text / Laser Text
• Tamper Resistant Lamination
• Guilloche Patterns

Many countries have been researching solutions for reasons from needing to verify proof of citizenship before providing any of the government provided services. A majority of the lesser developed nations provide many services to its citizens and a major problem is knowing who does and doesn’t have the right to these services. Other reasons governments are seeking national identification card solutions include:

• Voter Registration
• Border Control
• Police Records
• Census Information
• Taxation
• Misc Government Benefits
• Health Care

If you would like to discuss solutions that might be applicable for a particular need, please contact our offices.
National ID Cards | FullIdentity.com


Constitutionality
Some critics claim that the Real ID Act violates the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution as a federal legislation in an area that, under the terms of the Tenth Amendment, is the province of the states. Thus, Anthony Romero, the executive director of ACLU, stated: "... Real ID is an unfunded mandate that violates the Constitution's 10th Amendment on state powers, destroys states' dual sovereignty and consolidates every American's private information, leaving all of us far more vulnerable to identity thieves." [49].
Former Republican U.S. Representative Bob Barr wrote in a February 2008 article: "A person not possessing a Real ID Act-compliant identification card could not enter any federal building, or an office of his or her congressman or senator or the U.S. Capitol. This effectively denies that person their fundamental rights to assembly and to petition the government as guaranteed in the First Amendment." [50]
The DHS final rule [10] regarding implementation of the Real ID Act discusses a number of constitutional concerns raised by the commenters on the proposed version of this rule. The DHS rule explicitly rejects the assertion that the implementation of the Real ID Act will lead to violations of the citizens' individual constitutional rights (page 5284 of the DHS rule in the Federal register). In relation to the Tenth Amendment argument about violation of states' constitutional rights, the DHS rule acknowledges that that these concerns have been raised by a number of individual commenters and in the comments by some states. The DHS rule does not attempt to rebuff the Tenth Amendment argument directly, but says that the DHS is acting in accordance with the authority granted to it by the Real ID Act and that DHS has been and will be working closely with the states on the implementation of the Real ID Act (pages 5284 and 5317 of the DHS final rule in the Federal Register).
On November 1, 2007, attorneys for Defenders of Wildlife and the Sierra Club filed an amended complaint in U.S. District Court challenging the 2005 REAL ID Act. The amended complaint alleges that this unprecedented authority violates the fundamental separation of powers principles enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. The environmental groups argue that Congress unconstitutionally delegated the power to the Department of Homeland Security (an appointed Executive branch not accountable to the public) to pick and choose which laws will apply to border wall construction. On December 18, 2007, Judge Ellen S. Huvelle rejected the challenge.[51][52]
On March 17, 2008, attorneys for Defenders of Wildlife and the Sierra Club filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court to hear its "constitutional challenge to the Secretary’s decision waiving nineteen federal laws, and all state and local legal requirements related to them, in connection with the construction of a barrier along a portion of the border with Mexico"[53][54]. They question whether the preclusion of judicial review amounts to an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power and whether the "grant of waiver authority violates Article I’s requirement that a duly-enacted law may be repealed only by legislation approved by both Houses of Congress and presented to the President"[53]. On April 17, 2008, numerous amicus briefs "supporting the petition were filed on behalf 14 members of Congress, a diverse coalition of conservation, religious and Native American organizations, and 28 law professors and constitutional scholars"[55][56][57].

REAL ID Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia