Your name or email adress:
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up


    Results 1 to 2 of 2
    1. #1
      XXPANTHAXX's Avatar
      XXPANTHAXX is offline Organizer

      Join Date
      Jan 2004
      Location
      klan mountain, ga
      Posts
      6,529
      Blog Entries
      7
      Thumbs Up/Down
      Received: 22/0
      Given: 145/1
      Rep Power
      610

      Lightbulb Tsvangirai, McGee black faces of white fright


      0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
      AFRICAN FOCUS By Tafataona P. Mahoso

      THE Herald newspaper did well on May 28 2008 when it alerted the nation
      to the meetings being held in South Africa, Botswana and Zimbabwe,
      meetings being convened by two US ambassadors (James McGee and Patrick
      Kelly Diskin) and the UK ambassador to Zimbabwe, Mr Andrew Pocock.

      The white Anglo-Saxon axis is in panic over Africa; and Zimbabwe is at
      the epicentre of the white tremors currently wearing the black faces of
      James McGee and Morgan Tsvangirai. Not only did these ambassadors follow
      the same route Morgan Tsvangirai has been travelling since the March
      harmonised elections; Diskin and Pocock have, in fact, followed McGee
      and Tsvangirai back to Zimbabwe as the campaign for the June 27 run-off
      election starts.

      But is there a panic? Why is there a panic? There is a panic because
      these ambassadors have been co-ordinators of what the US expert
      saboteur, John Perkins, calls the "CIA jackals" phase of the regime
      change project against Zimbabwe. There is panic because the key
      activities of the "CIA jackals" in the last month have produced results
      which have backfired on the sponsors. What do we mean?

      We mean that, on the political surface these activities were supposed to
      start with the turning away from South African shores of the Chinese
      ship bringing weapons for various Sadc countries; and reach a climax
      with the misnamed "xenophobic attacks" on alleged Zimbabweans in South
      Africa which were supposed to be echoed by equally horrific Selous
      Scouts-styled attacks on resettled peasants and farmers in Zanu-PF
      strongholds inside Zimbabwe.

      The aim was to project Zimbabwe as a country which was such a grave
      menace to itself and its neighbours that UN Secretary- General Ban
      Ki-moon would be left with no choice but to go back to the UK-US demand
      that Zimbabwe be brought before the UN Security Council, which the UK
      would chair anyway.

      In all these surface political activities and the accompanying media
      publicity, the victims of intra-community violence in South Africa and
      the victims of sponsored violence inside Zimbabwe would be portrayed as
      opponents of President Mugabe. That was the meaning of The Standard
      story: "Zimbabweans: beaten and killed at home and away", on the front
      page on May 25 2008.

      And while UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon would be doing Britain’s bid
      against Zimbabwe at the Security Council, former UN Secretary-General
      Kofi Annan would also be given the set of political events needed to
      justify agitation for a Kenya-style government of national unity (GNU)
      in Zimbabwe. Such a GNU would rescue Tsvangirai from the massive
      backlash which he has provoked in the whole region since the March 29
      harmonised elections.

      The same week as The Standard story attempting to portray all victims of
      violence at home and abroad as opponents of President Mugabe also saw an
      unusual number of stories on the so-called government of national unity:
      "GNU unavoidable, says Mnangagwa," The Standard, May 25; Annan pushes
      for GNU," Zimbabwe Independent, May 30; "Makoni calls for transitional
      government," Zimbabwe Independent, May 30; and "Zanu-PF, MDC in secret
      GNU talks," Zimbabwe Independent, May 23 2008.

      Beneath this political propaganda surface, there is the economic war
      whose contours are shaped by the US sanctions law against Zimbabwe: the
      Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act.

      The two levels are, however, inter- dependent. The engines of inflation
      in Zimbabwe are embedded in the sanctions regime and in the structure of
      the neo-colonial economy; but the resulting inflation is open, public
      and experienced daily and openly, just like the political events on the
      surface.

      In his Black Book of American Intervention in Chile, Armando Uribe
      concluded that the political supremacy of US-led imperialism depended
      both on military control and economic control. Security and military
      control was the main objective of the empire’s public institutions while
      economic control was the main objective of its private and corporate
      institutions. Uribe concluded thus: "Dividing and bringing internal
      confusion to all the structures of the dominated country, beginning with
      the political and administrative, is a deliberate activity of the public
      and private agents of imperialism."

      Put another way, a country dominated by imperialism suffers the great
      disadvantage that, whereas the public and corporate sectors in
      imperialist countries are united in their objective of world domination,
      the public and corporate sectors in the dominated country are usually
      antagonistic.

      This antagonism explains why, in Zimbabwe, for instance, the
      Confederation of Zimbabwe Industries and the Zimbabwe National Chamber
      of Commerce have refused to condemn and resist the illegal economic
      sanctions imposed on Zimbabwe, unlike in apartheid South Africa and
      Rhodesia during UDI, where they saw their role as part of the Western
      domination of Africa and therefore helped break the sanctions on behalf
      of imperialist and white settler interests.

      A correct interpretation of Uribe’s observation therefore is that when
      imperialism undermines the economy of the targeted country it generates
      facts and effects which feed its propaganda against that country’s
      political institutions and leadership. Likewise, when imperialism
      engages in propaganda attacks on the public institutions of the targeted
      country, the propaganda or psychological war also generates "facts" and
      effects which also undermine the economy.

      This fact makes the acknowledgment of political sanctions while denying
      economic sanctions against Zimbabwe a merely academic exercise or part
      of the strategy to deceive the people.

      Causes of the White Fright

      There are many reasons why the regime change camp and its sponsors are
      in panic mode over Zimbabwe.

      The first reason is that the successful examples after which Zimbabwe
      was supposed to model itself, Kenya and South Africa, have become
      problematic. The death of more than a thousand people and the
      displacement of many more in Kenya after the abortive elections of
      December 2007, rendered Kenya ineffective as a model for Zimbabwe to
      follow in terms of neo-colonialist discourse.

      The so-called "xenophobic attacks" on migrant workers in South Africa
      was originally meant to be blamed on Zimbabwe and to galvanise
      anti-Zimbabwe sentiment throughout the region. The violent attacks on
      migrant workers would have been blamed on Zimbabwe while South Africa
      itself would be pictured as a shining example of economic and political
      success, which explained why so many Zimbabweans left Zimbabwe to go
      there.

      But the opposite has happened. The majority of migrant workers affected
      have turned out to be Mozambicans, and this is hardly a surprise. But
      the countries with affected nationals have turned out to be many more
      than Zimbabwe. They include Nigeria, Somalia, Zambia, Malawi, Botswana
      and others.

      Instead of generating anti-Zimbabwe hysteria, the attacks have exposed
      the limits of South Africa’s "Rainbow" ethos and provoked a fresh
      Pan-African backlash against the opposition forces and media driving the
      anti-Zimbabwe interpretations.

      More specifically, the fact that Morgan Tsvangirai was the only
      opposition politician from outside South Africa who openly tried to
      exploit the clashes further, and to use them against the Government of
      Zimbabwe, has focused suspicion on foreign-sponsored opposition parties
      in the region. This is so when observers look back and see the same
      forces behind the turning away of the Chinese ship in the same country a
      month before. At that time US Assistant Secretary of State Jendayi
      Fraser threw herself into the middle of the controversy surrounding the
      turning away of the Chinese ship.

      In other words, the series of orchestrated events were supposed to end
      with Zimbabwe sitting before the UN Security Council and the US and UK
      being given that body’s permission to intervene directly in Zimbabwe.
      Instead, the orchestrated events have produced what we saw on the front
      page of The Herald newspaper of May 30 2008: "Stop meddling in Zimbabwe,
      Mbeki tells Bush".

      The second reason for the white fright is that the personalities who
      were to be deployed against Zimbabwe have found their assignment
      completely overshadowed by much bigger and more urgent developments: UN
      Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has found himself having to deal with a
      real and much bigger crisis caused by cyclone Nagis in Myanmar. From
      there he has had to attend to yet another real natural catastrophe in
      the form of the aftermath of the earthquake in China.

      The white racist opposition in South Africa, led by the Democratic
      Alliance, has tried hard to make Zimbabwe the main issue in the
      intra-community violence taking place in that country. But this has
      failed dismally.

      Archbishop Desmond Tutu has also found it impossible to continue
      hammering at the mote in Zimbabwe’s eye while covering up the log in
      South Africa’s own eye. The intra-community attacks on Africans there
      have been quite horrific and unlike anything ever seen in Zimbabwe. So,
      whatever challenges Zimbabwe may be facing, they are not what the
      white-sponsored opposition forces in the region say they are; which is
      to say that the regime change forces are the wrong players to resolve
      those challenges.

      A third cause for the white fright is the failure of the "blitzkrieg"
      which the MDC and its white sponsors unleashed on Zimbabwe just before
      the March 2008 harmonised elections.

      One effect of the foreign Euro-American sponsorship of African
      opposition parties is that they are forced to adopt a "blitzkrieg"
      approach to election campaigning and propaganda.

      The "blitzkrieg" approach was developed by Adolph Hitler and the Nazis
      of Germany. It has been inherited by the new rightwing movements of the
      West who now sponsor regime change around the world.

      A "blitzkrieg" approach requires big and fast lies or propaganda; it
      requires doing and achieving the regime overthrow "ka one", meaning fast
      and at once. Everything is done so big and so fast that most countries
      are unable to pick up the pieces or explain what has actually happened.

      The Zambians are still not sure how they discarded former president
      Kenneth Kaunda and his United National Independence Party (UNIP) so
      fast. The Kenyans have found that everything fell apart so fast that
      neither a re-run nor a run-off could be undertaken. The only thing that
      was possible was to forget the messed-up elections and go to the
      negotiating table. This is what the MDC’s sponsors had prepared for
      Zimbabwe in 2008.
      Nov 2, 2010 "Assata Shakur Liberation Day" marks 31 yrs of freedom for our Comrade Assata Shakur, Our Warrior was liberated from a NJ prison by Comrades In The Black Liberation Army click here to read more or here www.assatashakur.com

    2. #2
      Langalibalele's Avatar
      Langalibalele is offline Honorable Ancestor

      Join Date
      Nov 2005
      Location
      Little Haiti, Pittsburgh aka Amerikaz Black Colony
      Posts
      669
      Blog Entries
      7
      Thumbs Up/Down
      Received: 0/0
      Given: 0/0
      Rep Power
      178

      Tsvangarai, McGee black faces of white fright


      0 Not allowed! Not allowed!
      Very good article. I emailed it to my board at URC Discuss. I am only sorry I didnt discover it two weeks ago when you posted it. Keep digging!


    Thread Information

    Users Browsing this Thread

    There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Similar Threads

    1. Replies: 0
      Last Post: 02-07-2012, 12:42 AM
    2. Just whose tune is Tsvangirai singing?
      By XXPANTHAXX in forum Liberation Strategy
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 08-19-2008, 08:13 PM
    3. Tsvangirai: Please grow up
      By XXPANTHAXX in forum Breaking Down and Understanding Our Enemies
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 06-23-2008, 10:34 PM
    4. Mbeki faces prospect of black opposition party
      By OsunkoyaIfayomi in forum Afrikan World News
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 08-23-2005, 07:21 AM
    5. White Fright (written by a white man)
      By Rebel Queen in forum Open Forum
      Replies: 25
      Last Post: 03-01-2005, 10:32 AM

    Thread Participants: 1

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  


    About

      Assata Shakur Speaks is an Forum Devoted To Assata Shakur And All Political Prisoners Around The World.
      Assata Shakur Speaks Is An Oasis Of Pan African Information Geared Towards The Liberation Of Afrikan People.

    Follow Us On

    Twitter Facebook youtube Flickr DavianArt Dribbble RSS Feed



    BACK TO TOP